[Review] Let’s Explore Diabetes with Owls

Let's Explore Diabetes with Owls CoverA friend of mine introduced me to David Sedaris a few years ago with Me Talk Pretty One Day. I wasn’t quite sure what to expect, and I’m not sure I got a really good handle on Sedaris by reading Me Talk Pretty, either. I enjoyed it, but didn’t really pursue any other books by Sedaris.

Since then, I’ve heard him a few times on NPR and have really enjoyed his work. When I found out he was coming to St. Louis for a book signing at Left Bank Books, I decided to grab tickets and catch him live.

That turned out to be a great decision. If you want the most out of Sedaris’ material, hearing him perform it is the way to go. Not that it doesn’t make for decent reading, but it’s definitely at its best when he’s performing it. It was also nice seeing an author who really seems to love interacting with his audience. He showed up early to sign books, did a reading of decent length, and then went back to signing books until 3 freaking a.m. (Luckily, we got ours signed before the reading, so we didn’t have to wait in line until after 2 a.m. It takes a hardcore fan, and a hardcore author, to stick it out that long!)

So, what’s it about? Really, it’s a collection of essays, musings, character sketches, and remembrances by Sedaris. We’re not talking great literature, but it’s enjoyable if you happen to be of a similar mindset to Sedaris (e.g., I doubt that Rush Limbaugh’s audience would be big fans). Some of the pieces I found riotously funny, some I found merely amusing.

If you’re going to pick it up, I do strongly recommend the audiobook. Generally I prefer reading to listening, but this really begs to be performed rather than read. Not sure if you’d enjoy Sedaris? Check out one of the podcasts from NPR where he’s featured.

Weekend Reading: “They Eat Puppies, Don’t They?” and “No Country for Old Men”

Cover for They Eat Puppies, Don't They?Knocked down a couple of fiction books this weekend while traveling to and from Southeast LinuxFest. They Eat Puppies, Don’t They? by Christopher Buckley, and No Country for Old Men by Cormac McCarthy.

I’ve been a fan of Christopher Buckley since I picked up Little Green Men years ago, but he’s probably best known for Thank You for Smoking. (It may be a cliche, but the book truly is better than the film – and the film’s plot diverges pretty heavily from the novel.)

They Eat Puppies is billed as political satire of the relationship between the U.S. and China, but it’s really a farce using China and U.S. relations as a framework. It was a quick read, I got a few chuckles out of it, but it’s far from Buckley’s best work. It’s sitcom-quality humor, and makes for good light reading, but I would be hard-pressed to give it a strong recommendation. If you like Buckley’s other work and want some lightweight reading, give it a try. If you haven’t read Buckley’s other work, pick up Thank You for Smoking and save They Eat Puppies for a long flight when you really just need a distraction. (It was a great palette cleanser after finishing The Corner.) 

No Country for Old Men is a quick read, but I don’t think you could call it light reading. I suppose it’s a great novel for people who find Steven King horror novels too uplifting.

On the surface, No Country is a tale about a welder who finds a satchel full of cash at the scene of a drug deal gone bad – and the unrelenting assassin who comes after the money and drugs. It goes deeper than that, though. The primary themes is societal decay, and how one person chooses to react in the face of the decay.

Having seen the movie, I was eager to read the book and get a little deeper into the characters and gather some understanding of Anton Chigurh. On that front, I was disappointed, as the book doesn’t really get into any deep characterizations or go into Chigurh’s thoughts. If you’ve seen the film, you can probably safely skip the book, unless you just really enjoyed the film and would like to relive it with a bit more detail. (I will say that the book is totally unambiguous on a point that the film is slightly queasy about showing explicitly.)

Thoughts, comments, and book suggestions always welcome.

[Review] The Corner: A Year in the Life of an Inner-City Neighborhood

The_Corner_book_cover A few years ago, I came late to The Wire, but caught up quickly. Usually I’m not one to buy the hype for television series, but I had to admit that The Wire was every bit as powerful, funny, and eye-opening as its fans claimed. It’s a show that you tell friends “you need to watch this” rather than “you’ll really enjoy it,” because they really do need to watch it.

The Wire is necessary because it actually provides a glimpse into the reality of ground zero in the War on Drugs – a topic that any person (at least in the U.S.) should be well-educated on, but probably is not. And if The Wire is required watching, the book that preceded and inspired it should be required reading. It should be required reading, starting in jr. high if not sooner. 

The Corner: A Year in the Life of an Inner-City Neighborhood, by David Simon and Edward Burns, is as gripping and compelling as any work of fiction I’ve ever read. But it has the virtue of being a true story, and true journalism. Simon and Burns spent months getting to know the subjects in the book, then a solid year following their lives on the corner. Interviews, observation, and follow-ups after the year was over. 

The Corner gives a first-hand look at what life is like for those living in the middle of one of the worst neighborhoods in the United States. It provides a look at what growing up in poverty is really like, and why it’s not just as simple as “pulling yourself up by your bootstraps.” It might surprise people to learn that the corner that Simon and Burns chose is near the birthplace of H.L. Mencken, the sage of Baltimore. The world of Mencken and the world of teen drug slingers and desperate dope fiends are separated only by a few decades and less than a mile.

And The Corner tells the tale from the beginning. Simon and Burns cover the scope of Baltimore’s downfall, from the early 1900s when the McCullough family first settled into Baltimore, through four generations of McCulloughs. From stand-up citizen and family man, to his fallen son who essentially abandons his son to pursue his addiction, to a teen who plays at slinging drugs and fathers his own son while still too young to drive. This is how fast our cities decay.

You’ll find some hope, but not much, at the end of the book. The book is set in 1994, and published in 1997. More than a decade and a half later, we know how the story goes for many of the people in the book. 

As a work of journalism, I’m simply in awe. We need so much more of this. I can’t say that I “loved” the book in the same way I enjoy a good book of fiction or entertaining non-fiction. After 500+ pages, I was ready to leave this world behind and only regretted that there isn’t more of Simon’s work out there to take on next. (Simon has only two books to his name, this and Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets.)  This book is a five out of five stars, perhaps six. It should certainly be required reading for anyone who aspires to have an opinion about the war on drugs or welfare policy in the United States.

 

Review: Star Trek Into Darkness

Star Trek Into Darkness PosterOn the surface, if you don’t think about it very hard, Star Trek Into Darkness is a reasonably decent summer movie. (Never mind the fact it’s not actually summer, it’s still a summer movie…) The movie moves quickly, has some payoffs for the Trek fans but is totally approachable for non-Trekkies, and of course the special effects are over the top. But with all the work that has been put into making things pretty, J.J. Abrams, Roberto Orci, and Alex Kurtzman take a lot of shortcuts with the characters and logic for the film.

(Spoilers below…)

Continue reading

Predictions on Tumblr

If you haven’t heard that Yahoo is buying Tumblr for $1.1 billion (mostly cash), then you’re probably not paying a lot of attention to tech news.

Here’s my off-the-cuff predictions:

  • Despite Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer’s promise, yes, Yahoo will screw it up. A company that can’t seem to get a grip on its own direction isn’t going to be able to execute on integrating a new company with such a different personality and sizable user base without effing it up. Most acquisitions don’t do well, and in its entire history, I’ve yet to see Yahoo do well by an acquisition. Mayer has not explained why this will be any different.
  • Yahoo will futz with the Tumblr terms of service soon to disallow a lot of the content (read: adult content) that drives Tumblr.
  • At some point, Yahoo will insist on integrating the account systems between the two companies.
  • Yahoo will start pushing ads into Tumblr, pissing off the Tumblr user base.
  • Yahoo will be a target for copyright vultures going after content being reshared on Tumblr that isn’t being shared legally.

The Tumblr folks will make out like bandits and walk away from Yahoo the moment they’re contractually able to. Yahoo will have overpaid for a property it doesn’t know what to do with, and Yahoo will continue flailing.

My To-Read List for the Rest of the Year

To Read PileMy current to-read list for the rest of 2013. I’d like to finish all of these by the end of 2013, if not sooner.

This doesn’t preclude my adding a few more titles, or moving them around.

I’ve already started Words and Rules and have almost completed Sacre Bleu and A Collection of Essays by George Orwell. (I’m finding Sacre Bleu much less interesting than usual for Moore’s books, but I’m determined to finish it…)

  • Sacre Bleu by Christopher Moore
  • 11/22/63 by Stephen King
  • A Choice of Days by HL Mencken
  • A Collection of Essays by George Orwell by George Orwell
  • A People’s History of the United States by Howard Zinn
  • Clarence Darrow by John A. Farrell
  • Contempt of Court by Mark Curriden and Leroy Phillips
  • Drink by Iain Gately
  • Fierce Invalids Home from Hot Climates by Tom Robbins
  • For Us, The Living by Robert A. Heinlein
  • Hitch-22 by Christopher Hitchens
  • How to be Alone by Jonathan Franzen
  • John Adams by David McCullogh
  • Midaq Alley by Naguib Mahfouz
  • Night of the Living Trekkies by Kevin David Anderson and Sam Stall
  • Stand on Zanzibar by John Brunner
  • Strong Motion by Jonathan Franzen
  • The Boxer Rebellion by Diana Preston
  • The Corner by David Simon and Edward Burns
  • The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire by Edward Gibbon
  • The End of Faith by Sam Harris
  • The Gang that Couldn’t Shoot Straight by Jimmy Breslin
  • The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood
  • Wise Blood by Flannery O’Connor
  • Words and Rules by Steven Pinker

Book Review: Gulp by Mary Roach

Gulp Book Cover Mary Roach’s Gulp: Adventures on the Alimentary Canal is typical of her books, which is to say it’s a highly enjoyable read that belies the amount of research that’s obviously gone into the work.

Like her other books, Stiff, Bonk, Spook, etc., Roach takes a topic that doesn’t necessarily lend itself to polite conversation – and then takes the reader on an extensive tour of the topic by way of speaking to a slew of experts and extracting the most interesting trivia from previous research.

The bibliography in the book is 15 pages, and it’s copiously footnoted throughout. What distinguishes Gulp and the rest of Roach’s oeuvre from more traditional research is that she makes it entertaining and engaging.

Gulp starts at the beginning, as it were, with the role that smell plays in taste. (Which is to say, way more than most people realize.) From there, she looks at why humans and their pets prefer different foods, some of our past misconceptions about food and digestion (be thankful you’re not expected to Fletcherize), all the way the lower colon and out again.

Along the way we learn that, perhaps, Elvis’ death and “bloated” look may have had more to do with a genetic disease of the colon than drugs or overeating. Roach also touches drug smuggling in uncomfortable places (sadly, no Pulp Fiction references), how flammable flatus is, and (the word of the day) all about boluses.

The only thing I don’t like about the book? The cover art. For some reason I find it really obnoxious, which is not at all fitting for the book or Roach herself.

I had the opportunity to meet Roach, briefly, earlier in April when she made an appearance arranged by Left Bank Books. The evening, which included some food that emphasized points made in the book, was punctuated by a forced intermission where we all decamped to the basement to wait out a tornado warning. Roach was undaunted by this and spent the time talking to attendees and signing books.

Rather than doing a reading from the book, she just talked a bit about her experiences writing the book and covered some of the information you’ll find in the first few chapters. The rest of the time was spent answering questions or trying the food.

If you have the opportunity to see Roach in person, I strongly recommend it. She’s intelligent, personable, and funny as hell. I also recommend picking up Gulp and/or any of her other books. Her work makes for fast reading, and you’ll likely learn quite a bit you didn’t know before about how your body works.

Rating: 5/5

Roger Ebert on Steak ‘n Shake

steak-n-shakeStumbled on this today, not the first time, but it was nice to find again. As a Missouri native, I have been eating at Steak ‘n Shake as long as I can remember, and always took my TAKHOMASAK privileges for granted.

When I moved to Denver, I realized Steak ‘n Shake wasn’t quite as ubiquitous as I thought. Nothing like jonesing for an Orange Freeze for a year or two to make you realize just how much you love a place.

Ebert sums it up pretty well:

If I were on Death Row, my last meal would be from Steak ‘n Shake. If I were to take President Obama and his family to dinner and the choice were up to me, it would be Steak ‘n Shake–and they would be delighted. If the Pope were to ask where he could get a good plate of spaghetti in America, I would reply, “Your Holiness, have you tried the Chili Mac or the Chili 3-Ways?”

(Not kidding about the death row thing, either. You can have your fine dining – I’d be pleased as punch to have a Steak ‘n Shake burger for any meal.)

And as Ebert notes, he doesn’t order anything not on the original menu. I have had the same order for, oh, about 38 years…

This Just In: Ministry is Officially Oldies Music

ministry-psalm-69 Not sure how I missed this. Psalm 69 turned 20 last year. It was definitely one of the high points of mainstream industrial rock, along with Nine Inch Nails’ Broken, Pretty Hate Machine, and The Downward Spiral. (For me, anyway. I’m just catching up with Front Line Assembly…)

I’m not a huge Ministry fan, but I really loved this album and caught them live at Lollapalooza in 1992 on tour for Psalm 69 - they killed it onstage and had a massive mosh pit going in the field. (The only performance of the day that matched Ministry was Pearl Jam, with Eddie Vedder climbing the rafters, literally.)

I have checked in with Ministry periodically since then, and nothing they’ve done since quite lived up to this album, IMHO. Pity, because I’d love another 20 albums like this.

20 years, man. Actually, closer to 21. That’s just crazypants. When I was a kid in the mid-70s, we listened to an oldies station a lot – and they played stuff from the 50s and 60s as “golden oldies.” So I guess this means that “Jesus Built My Hotrod” and “N.W.O.” are officially oldies now.

If you’re my age, you may now commence telling kids to get off your lawn.